Skip to main content

Book Review: Heart of Dread: Frozen

Heart of Dread: Frozen by Melissa de la Cruize, Michael Johnston

So my first official book review is here and I have mixed feelings. I loved the sound of this book, but disliked the way it was written... and yet still found myself softening up to it. I reckon it might be the shaky start to a great series.

Release Date: 2nd October

Recommend: If you don’t mind info dumping and love action, fantasy, dystopian fiction and anything in between.

Verdict: 3/5 stars

Nat is a young blackjack dealer working for New Vegas, but she’s also marked: a monster inside her head and magical gifts which she can’t control. The world has frozen over, the waters poisoned, and the marked are killed on sight. Even though Nat can hide her mark, she can’t stay in New Vegas – the voice won’t let her. She hires a cocky and young Wes and his crew of mercenaries to help her reach the warm paradise of Blue, a place that is only rumoured exist.

It’s actually more complicated than that little summary, with maps inside crystals, zombies, dystopian style government, magical creatures, military, pirates - you name it, this book has it whether it fits or is shoved in like a square in a triangle hole.

The Vegas theme felt so fresh and unique for a fantasy novel. It’s what drew me to the book. Another strength is that it’s action packed and full of twists... But there’s not much mystery or curious circumstances to make you want answers. Instead of learning the missing piece of the story, you're introduced to a whole new jigsaw that’s been completed behind your back. It’s still a good reveal, but it’s not particularly clever and doesn’t have that same gasp factor.

I actually had numerous quibbles that made me think maybe this novel was a redraft away from being epic...

Nat isn’t an interesting protagonist - I can’t pin a single personality trait to her - but Nat and Wes work well. Wes is witty and brave, and gladly takes half the narrative. Their relationship starts out a tad superficial, but they’re undeniably attracted to each other and connect to form something deeper. I can ignore Nat’s blandness when the second lead is strong, but I think it’s a bit of a shame. 

That's the problem with this book: some of it is bad but there's a lot to make up for it.

As with a lot of fantasy, the world is complicated. Early chapters are mostly history lesson, and whilst there are a few bits of action to start with, they happen a bit quick – too sudden for the characters show much emotion towards. I had to reread one section just to make sure it actually happened.

The info dumping doesn’t really let up either. Discoveries are made, and these require the history lectures to return. There’s too much detail in the overall world, and not enough time put into developing side characters, spicing up the narrative, or actually developing these concepts. I’m hoping that later books in the series won’t struggle with this as much, because there is a lot of potential.

The actual writing is a bit bland and heavy on the ‘tell’ side of showing and telling. This goes for the plot and character development. One example is, ‘Typical soldiers, they were brash, potty-mouthed, and hot-headed’. This isn’t exactly hard to show... and isn’t shown throughout the novel. It’s just told to us at the start and doesn’t even seem to concur. It feels a bit lazy.

But the book is action packed. While I found some of the action a bit superficial, there’s rarely a dull moment. But I’m going to talk about concepts again, because that’s mostly what this book was...

Some of the concepts were great, but for some reason the authors chose to include naff ones too. The authors must have had so many ideas they panicked and decided to used them all. If only the relevant concepts were used, and developed in more detail, this book could easily be 4 stars.

Not 5 though. I’ll reserve that for books that make me want to slow down while I’m reading and preserve the moment, books that I have to cover up sections when I know something epic is about to happen and I don’t want to ruin it. This book had none of those moments, but I have faith that the next in the series will.

*This was written as an honest review in exchange for a free copy through NetGalley. If you're a blogger too, check them out!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...