Skip to main content

Book Review: Insanity

INSANITY by Cameron Jace
4 stars
Verdict: Perfect if you're craving something a bit wacky.


After accidentally killing everyone in her class, Alice Wonder is now a patient in the Radcliffe Lunatic Asylum. No one doubts her insanity. Only a hookah-smoking professor believes otherwise; that he can prove her sanity by decoding Lewis Carroll's paintings, photographs, and find Wonderland's real whereabouts. Professor Caterpillar persuades the asylum that Alice can save lives and catch the wonderland monsters now reincarnated in modern day criminals. In order to do so, Alice leads a double life: an Oxford university student by day, a mad girl in an asylum by night. The line between sanity and insanity thins when she meets Jack Diamond, an arrogant college student who believes that nonsense is an actual science.


~*~


Throw your cats out the window, everyone, Insanity is here!

Warning: Most of this book is nonsensical. If you find a lack of logic frustrating, step away from the book before you get in too deep.

But if you love a mystery based adventure with zany characters and endless possibilities, then come take your first steps into Alice Wonder’s life.

This book is definitely something different. There’s nothing cliché or predictable about it, and I can imagine the author spent a lot of time trying to make sense using nonsense. I respect him a lot for creating something truly unique.

Is Alice crazy? Is she not? What it means to be insane is question in a way that will get you thinking, especially when mundane activities by supposedly normal people are twisted back around to feel strange. I know what to look out for the next time I ride a bus...

At first I thought there was no way I’d give this anything fewer than five stars, and that remained unchallenged for a while. When Alice steps out of the mental institute and into the real world, somehow the story goes completely nuts in a good way, but this is where I thought the novel peaked. Around half way into Alice's adventure, I found the nonsensical nature of the plot a bit of a novelty and soon grew tired of the way it was constructed.

Ah, that long middle section.

The problem with a world where almost anything imaginable can happen is that it’s impossible to predict or anticipate. Therefore I struggled to feel tension when situations got a little sticky. We know there will never be a moment where Alice is in peril because something nonsensical might happen and she’s okay; there's no point in guessing what will happen because the real twist won't be logical. For me, that meant my attention waned the more it went on, but I’d still highly recommend others to read it.

Despite the fact I’m from Oxford, my knowledge of Lewis Carroll was poor. I say ‘was’ because Jace adds in details about Lewis Carroll left, right and centre. I was a little sceptical of how much was fact and fiction (and if you read this novel, then you’ll know why!) but at the end I saw a note from the author. He sounds like a nice author, too. He researched Carroll thoroughly and even invites readers to discuss the book with him. Hats off to a friendly writer!

Nearer the climax, the story picks back up and finally links in a few past elements which help the story feel knitted together again. The ending opens up more questions than it answers, but I think I'll pass on the series. The questions it ended on weren't enough to hook me in, and I feel like book 2 make struggle with the same issues concerning tension and anticipation so I's rather leave Jace's world on a high.

Insanity has its fair share of twists and turns, unsolved mysteries, and shocking reveals so don't get me wrong - I enjoyed this novel a lot. I can’t help think if it was shorter, I would have preferred it a bit more. After all, there’s only so much madness I can take!

Source: Direct from author.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...