Skip to main content

Book Review: Witch Hunter

WITCH HUNTER by Virginia Boecker
4 Stars
Verdict
: Brilliant opening followed by lots of long conversations, a few odd moments peppered with action, and then an epic end. Review done.


Elizabeth Grey is one of the king's best witch hunters, devoted to rooting out witchcraft and doling out justice. But when she's accused of being a witch herself, Elizabeth is arrested and sentenced to burn at the stake.

Salvation comes from a man she thought was her enemy. Nicholas Perevil, the most powerful and dangerous wizard in the kingdom, offers her a deal: he will save her from execution if she can break the deadly curse that's been laid upon him.

But Nicholas and his followers know nothing of Elizabeth's witch hunting past--if they find out, the stake will be the least of her worries. And as she's thrust into the magical world of witches, ghosts, pirates, and one all-too-handsome healer, Elizabeth is forced to redefine her ideas of right and wrong, of friends and enemies, and of love and hate.


~*~

The first three chapters and the last section were my favourite. I think it’s well worth a read if you like the sound of this: a witch hunter who questions her allegiance when she’s thrown in jail and learns of a prophecy that means she is the only one who can save magic.

There’s nothing too special about Elizabeth Grey, our main character. We’re told she’s a good witch hunter, but only shown how she messes up a lot, which set the tone for the book. Elizabeth seems broken, unable to think for herself for the most part. She’s been cohered into a profession she never wanted, has her heart set on a guy who has been her whole world, and now has a prophecy to fall in line for – one that seems to predict her death.

The author knows how to write relationships in a way that tugged at my emotions, creating interesting side plots rather than overwhelming the story with romance. I never felt particularly fond of either of the love interests, but I liked how Elizabeth started to pull away from her roots. The transformation was very emotional in parts.

There was a very long early-middle section. It contains lots of tedious conversations and a bundle of new characters that weren’t used much. At this point, I was struggling to picture half of it, and there wasn’t much motivation to read to the end. There wasn’t a sense of tension or stakes.

I wasn’t expecting it to pick back up, but it started to gather pace and slowly enticed me back into its clutches. Although I could see most of the twists coming, they played out a little differently to what I was expecting, and that made it hard to put down.

A lot of things could have been done better. Firstly, there were possibly too many characters. Fifer seemed like a complete cliché, although I still found that she spiced up the story. I loved George the jester when we first met him, but he doesn’t really have a part to play in the book, and I even forgot he was even around. I can’t remember some of the other minor characters. If they become important in book two, then perhaps they should have been introduced later.

The twist concerning the herbs felt like the first person narrator was keeping a secret from the reader or added as an afterthought. Also, the idea of pirates and ghosts sounds awesome, but in reality, they were never really used. I get the feeling that this book could have been absolutely amazing, but it didn’t quite get there.

Prophecies can be a little tiresome in my opinion. We all know they’re two faced, and they’re always purposely vague – forcing the main character to follow their gibberish whim without another motive. This was no different, although I did think the writer made a good job of it.

There was a lot I enjoyed about this book, and it ended on a high note too. I think I’d like to at least take a peek of the next in the series.

Source: Netgalley.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...