Skip to main content

Book Review: Escape From Witchwood Hollow

ESCAPE FROM WITCHWOOD HOLLOW by Jordan Elizabeth
3 Stars
Verdict: Intriguing but not thrilling.



Everyone in Arnn - a small farming town with more legends than residents - knows the story of Witchwood Hollow: if you venture into the whispering forest, the witch will trap your soul among the shadowed trees.

***

Escape From Witchwood Hollow will always stand out to me as unusual in a good way. The eerie feeling of the hollow drew me in, and the multiple timelines developed steadily in a way that kept me thinking about where the story might be going. I’m a fan of the author and always surprised by some of her ideas, but overall this book didn’t hit the right notes for me.

There were three main perspectives, each with different stories surrounding the haunted Witchwood Hollow.

First we have schoolgirl Honoria from 2001. There’s not much to say about her, other than she’s still grieving the loss of her parents from the September 11th tragedy. I found her section just too bland with too many mundane events, and the romance was written in a very dry way.

Next up is the tale of a murderous witch from 1670. Lady Clifford’s perspective enthralled me, with her strange view on life and creepy thoughts. She seemed very unstable, and that’s what really pulled me in. I never knew whether she was going to snap, and every scene involving her was instantly tense.

Finally, we have Albertine from 1850. Albertine fascinated me. I had to face palm her naivety a few times, but I grew to like her. She didn’t always understand what was made so clear to the reader, and the use of dramatic irony really kept me reading. I thought the ‘tap tap tap’ would become more significant later on, and possibly in an incredibly creepy way, but it never really developed. I couldn’t help but feel it was a lost opportunity to really send shivers down a reader’s spine.

In Albertine and Honoria’s sections, the side characters piled high. I get the feeling this would have worked better as a novella with fewer character and less from Honoria perspective overall. If the book took a slightly different turn around mid-way, it could have been fantastically chilling. Instead, nothing major happened to carry the story forwards. Although parts still intrigued me, the tension ebbed away. I didn’t know what the book was building to, and it ended on that feeling for me.

I liked how the book linked together at the very end, but I didn’t like Albertine’s ending. Without adding in spoilers, I’ll just say it felt like no one actually did anything substantial to resolve the conflict, and then it was resolved. I didn’t really like Honoria’s ending either. I was expecting a fascinating twist, but instead it was more of a round off.

Sometimes the writing was clean and easy to read, each word slipping off the page. Other times it told rather than showed. My boyfriend read a line over my shoulder about a man’s beard, and we proceeded to discuss what the author had intended from this perplexing description.

I guess what I didn’t like so much about the book was the unfulfilled potential. I kept seeing snippets of fantastic writing and gripping storytelling, but then those snippets would pass by.

As I said before, I’m a fan of the author, but I think they’re still a book or two away from writing something utterly brilliant. I would recommend this to anyone looking for an intriguing story with a constant pace, but I can’t say more than that.

Source: Review copy from the author.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...