Skip to main content

Book Review: The Winner's Curse

THE WINNER'S CURSE by Marie Rutkoski
3 Stars 
Verdict: Slow and flowery. 


Kestrel is clever and tough, with a strategic mind and a sharp affinity for reading others. Arin is a defiant yet skilled slave, and clearly just as intelligent. After paying too much for him in an auction, Kestrel’s name becomes tarnished in society...

The first half of the book is sssssslllllooooowwww. While I’m not denying the author is good at the flowery prose (a bit of an oxymoron), a lot of words were wasted telling me something which could have been shown in a much more interesting and succinct way.

But what really puts cement in its shoes is that nothing much happens. Oh, there’s gossip. And romance. Silly romance. Time spent with horses. Tea parties. Other parties...

Where’s the, erm, well...story?

Kestrel can be an idiot too. She’s a little hypocritical when it comes to gossipers, and spends a lot of the book sorting out her own shortfalls – actually, that made her a well rounded character who I grew to like.

On the other hand, Arin confused me. The Arin at the start of the book barely resembles the one towards the end, although there was no real catalyst for his change. I’m not sure I can believe his character arc.

I found the dialogue heavily stunted in this. The flowery prose often interfered with the flow, the moment. Nearly every line of dialogue is analysed afterwards, mostly to point out the obvious or to jar the pace. Jarring is better than constant summaries though. What could have been heated dialogue, tense debate, or witty banter, was taken out of the moment, out of direct dialogue or lifelike detail. This spilled over to the action, too. I get the sense that the author wanted to move the pace along, when really they were grinding it to a halt.

So with the pace sluggish, the dialogue distant, and the details left to the imagination, I found this book fuzzy to picture.

The last half is where it really kicks off. The war heats up, the character dilemma tangles, and Kestrel shows her aptitude for strategy.
I’m a little annoyed and how much I liked it towards the end, because it shows it could have been a fantastic book. Kestrel has a manipulative mind which twists the story in intriguing ways. The story ends with a substantial round off, yet enough to leave me curious for where it might go.

I’ll take a chance on book two, just to see where the kestrel flies.

Source: Bought it as an ebook.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...