Skip to main content

When to Ignore a Critic: Part 1

The votes are in. It turns out you guys want to know more about when it’s okay to ignore critics. This is probably because we've all had bad reviews. If you've only had love for everything you write, chances are you haven’t faced the right audience yet. 

However, this article is a much about when to listen to a critic as it is to ignore them.

You can’t please everyone. 

You’re not even meant to please everyone. A critic once told me to only listen to people who didn’t like my genre, didn’t like the first chapter, and wouldn’t have read the book after reading the blurb. This angered me because I worried she might have told others to do this too.

At first, I wanted to rant back at her how absurd that was - you write for an audience, a subsection – but then I realised she’d learn that in her own time or suffer the consequences.

Sure, some books are loved by all. Harry Potter is a good example. It was originally aimed at a young audience, yet it enchanted most of the nation. The issue here is that you don’t aim to write a Harry Potter. Well, you kinda do, but not that overtly.

Of course you can write more mainstream and for a general audience. By doing so, you won’t be aiming at real lovers of that genre, and neither will you appeal to everyone in the world.

Please an audience. 

When a critic states they are a huge fan of your genre, have read many books on a similar topic, then you should perk your ears up to what they have to say. They know the genre (as should you!) and they represent the people who would buy your book.

When a critic states this isn’t their preferred genre, then be cautious. Would they buy the book when it’s published? Probably not. Again, you can’t please everyone.

Please yourself. 

This is something that much more famous and greater writers than I have said many times before. Write because you enjoy it. If a critic tells you to make a change that would make you dislike your own story, then ignore them. For now, anyway.

If you’re showing others your work with intent to publish, you may have to make some sacrifices. ‘I like it’ shouldn’t be your excuse for dismissing thousands of negative comments. That joke your character says may be hilarious to you, but if your readers are cringing, then it’s a bit similar to when you’re the only person in the room laughing at your own joke. The only thing missing is the room.

Click here for part 2.

Comments

  1. I think it's great that you decided to blog about this because sometimes it makes me guilty if I don't do something a critic told me to, because I didn't like where the change was going. Sure, there are some people who review just so that they can point out faults, but a got critic is hard to find. :) Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This has been something I've been wondering about for a while! Thanks! :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a great point. You can't please everyone, and if the majority of people that review your story enjoy it and a few select people don't, don't beat yourself up about it. You can't please everyone. this helped me out a lot because after getting lulled into a false sense of security with nice, kind comments on one of my stories, I got a particularly critical one that hit me off guard. It broke me down for a bit, but this helped me realize "hey, I can't please everyone" and that's how it goes. So thank you for this post. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...