Skip to main content

Book Review: The Bear and the Nightingale

THE BEAR AND THE NIGHTINGALE by Katherine Arden
3 Stars
Verdict: Not for me.


Vasilisa grows up at the edge of the Russian wilderness, surrounded by the love of her siblings. She has a wild spirit that cannot be tamed for any suitor or convent, and finds she is able to see and protect the spirits that in turn protect her home. However, her stepmother fears them, and when the winter becomes harsh, and the Vasilisa is blamed. She must fight the cold, her stepmother, and be brave in the face of the demons to protect her home and the ones she loves.

I think the author has gone to great lengths to make this book feel authentic. The Russian names and words were a lot to take in, so I was glad to be reading the kindle version for quick definitions. After a while, it's fairly easy to adapt to, and the language equates to strong 'feel' of medieval winters in the heart of Russia.

Still, the prose felt hampered down with extraneous details, and the story in general was dreadfully slow. It took it's sweet time before anything truly magical happened, and even then, it felt more like a tale of madness than one of magic. The deep religious roots also anchors the story to a theme I'm not particularly interested in. I could see early on this wasn't the book for me.

I started to enjoy this book towards the end, but it was mostly a test of persistence. The timeline often flew by in chunks, and I struggled to get the point of the story as a whole. It doesn't help that I'm not a fan of stories that skip wildly ahead, missing out the choices, the stories between, and the context of how their lives ended up where there are now. It lacked intensity for me, which was only regained in the last section.

Many have said this book is similar to Uprooted, another book I only partly enjoyed. I didn't find much similarity between the two books, apart from the Eastern-European setting, but everything I didn't like about Uprooted was stronger in The Bear and the Nightingale. The slow pace, the heavy prose, the distance from the characters. Although I got bored of Uprooted, I found more to love in it, and where Uprooted felt lyrical and beautiful, this book just felt heavy.

All I can say is that I enjoyed parts, but I was mostly bored. I'm really sad that I couldn't get out of it that everyone else seems to be able to so easily. It's a well loved book by most of the rest of the reading community, so worth a spin if nothing I've said has put you off.

Source: Bought it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...