Skip to main content

Book Review: Divergent

DIVERGENT by Veronica Roth
4 Stars
Verdict: A thrilling ending!
#2 - Insurgent
#3 - Allegiant


Society is divided into five factions, each dedicated to the cultivation of a particular virtue, in the attempt to form a 'perfect society'. On her Choosing Day, Beatrice Prior renames herself Tris, rejects her family's Abnegation group, and chooses another faction.


~*~

This book has been on my radar for a while. It’s had a lot of hype which is almost always a bad thing, and it’s got a many well-loved shadows cast over it. I’ll do my best to treat Divergent fairly.

Let’s get it out of the way: The Hunger Games was better in premise, thrill factor, world building, and characterisation (book 1, anyway). Divergent didn’t need to be the next Hunger Games to get five stars out of me, but it didn’t hit the spot either. I still enjoyed it, I still can’t wait to read the next one, but I think the greatness is yet to come in this series.

The world is split into 5 factions which each focus on one good trait: peace, knowledge, honesty, bravery, or selflessness. When you think about it, the whole book concept revolves around stereotypes and hazing, which is quite a scary but intriguing idea.

It’s a bit jargon heavy at first, but information is layered on and gradually the different factions felt natural. The world concept is probably my favourite thing about this novel, although there’s a lot of wiggle room for books 2 and 3 to flesh out the details.

Tris struck me as pretty normal at first. As soon as she was able to make choices, her true character started to shine. I love the dark and rough aspect to this, and the fact that our usual morals are kicked aside to make way for the strong and the brave (although a little mean). Tris is a character who doesn’t act the way I expect, and that’s what made me want to read on.

I’m glad the romance was the subplot. I didn’t feel the chemistry, although Four really intrigues me. He seems a complex character, and I found myself trying to read more meaning into his words. I felt like his dialogue was chosen very specifically, although I still don’t fully understand what that reason is. If you haven’t already guessed, the theme of this review is ‘maybe the sequel will give me more answers’.

Light spoilers ahead, guys!

Some of the other stuff seemed a bit... uninteresting? The fights only gripped me at first, and the simulations were too superficial to hook me in. Even if the characters tend to believe the simulations are real, I can’t. At least those sections were short and pointed, and there were other twists and gripping scenes to mix the plot up a bit. Tris chooses to move from the selfless faction (Abnegation) to the bravery faction (Dauntless). Things get rough, dark, and dangerous as Tris has to prove she’s brave in a corrupt and tough faction. The brutal ranking the individuals kept me on the edge of my seat to make sure both Tris and the nicer Dauntless folk would make it.

The ‘Dauntless folk’ isn’t exactly what they’re called, but none of them stood out too well, apart from maybe Christina. Roth needed a big pool of characters to whittle down. I think characters were handled as best as could be expected, with Roth focusing on the mains and working the sides in over time. Again, the next book could be where I really start to care about the others.

The end almost felt like a simulation to me. A rush of events and twists and deaths and what the hell’s. If the rest of the book had been a bit shorter and this section was a bit longer, the pacing would have felt better balanced. Overall, the pacing was above average.

There’s enough of everything in this book. There are enough thrills, enough twists, and enough character to root for. It was easy to read and I can’t wait for the next book. I kinda feel like this book is a prequel to something big, and so fingers crossed it’s all up from here.

Source: Paid for it myself with money and everything!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...