Skip to main content

Book Review: Life of Pi

Life of Pi by Yann Martel

5 stars

Recommend:
Those who want a gritty and thought-provoking story, and can take a slow start.


Life of Pi is a fantasy adventure novel by Yann Martel published in 2001. The protagonist, Piscine Molitor "Pi" Patel, a Tamil boy from Pondicherry, explores issues of spirituality and practicality from an early age. He survives 227 days after a shipwreck while stranded on a boat in the Pacific Ocean with a Bengal tiger named Richard Parker.


~*~

My English teacher from sixth form recommended me this book. I didn’t read it. I wanted to. I was, erm, going to after I finished my coursework... It was next on my list... Well, now I’ve seen the film the book will feel slow. I saw it in a charity shop and finally stopped making excuses.

I’m mentioning this because if I hadn’t been so motivated to finally finish it, I might have stopped 50 pages in. I’m glad I kept reading, but I do sympathise with 50-pages-in me. Not often a book will manage to hook in and bore at the same time, but that’s exactly how I felt in part 1. If I had met Pi in real life, I’d listened to his stories endlessly but I might have piped up with ‘When do we get to the part with the boat?’ a couple of times. After finishing the book, I finally appreciated more of the musings at the start but that’s not much good when you’re actually reading it.

As soon as the front cover came into play, I was reluctant to put the book down. Martel certainly has that 'storyteller' quality. His prose is rich with metaphor, interesting facts and musings, and character development that spun a bizarre tale into a believable account.

This book is not for the fainthearted and some bits set off my haemaphobia. Vivid is an understatement. I saw the film first, and this was more vivid than the lifelike replay. You have to commend Martel’s way with words for that!

The animal psychology sections appealed to me a lot. As a psychology graduate, I always love to see a bit of psych in action, especially when the author knows what they’re talking about. So many authors will mention brain regions, social psychology titbits, or, as I recently read, ‘olfactory nerves’ without knowing more than a skim-read wiki article on the topic, but Martel knows his stuff. He knows his animals. He knows them so well, I felt like Pi must really exist because who other than a zookeeper's son would know so much about animals and animal psychology?

The ending is designed to make you think, and that’s exactly what I did for hours after putting it down. If you’ve read it and are wondering which way I sway, I’ve decided to believe in the tiger up to the bit with the blind man. I’m glad we’ll never know because I can keep thinking and wondering without any restraints.

I learned a lot from this book. I learned that green sea is shallower than blue, and you can paralyze a fish by poking its eyes. I learned that a tiger won’t attack if you stare at it, and the psychology behind how lion taming. Most importantly, I learned I wouldn’t survive in the unlikely event that I end up stranded in the sea with not much other than a Bengal Tiger...

Source: Bought from a charity shop. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Best Character: Quiz and Contest

The best characters are put through hell and yet can still carry the story forward on their broken shoulders. Your plot will fall flat if your characters are one dimensional and strong characters can make a cliché story really shine; characterisation takes work and thought. The key to character development is to ask questions. Maybe spend time thinking about the scenarios that have happened to your character which won’t make the final cut of the novel. The questions below are designed to test that (to some degree). [NOW CLOSED, REVIEWS PENDING] Answer at least 5 of these in a comment with a link to your story and I’ll give you an in-depth review. Reviews are approximately 1000 words and take me well over an hour, so if you’re looking to polish up your manuscript then don’t miss out. Also, the opening chapter with the most interesting and well-developed character will be featured on this blog! Feel free to write about anyone as long as they feature in the same story. You can ans...

Opening Chapter: Quiz and Contest

The opening chapter is pivotal. It needs to draw in an intended audience – it needs flare and promise of things to come, with writing that earns the reader’s trust, luring them into the next chapter.  I’ve made a quick quiz to test whether your opening has what it takes. You don’t need all of these things for a good chapter. Hell, I bet there are a few I’ve forgotten too! Answer each of the following using evidence from your opening. If you can’t, then maybe you need to spice up the chapter. 1) Is your opening line unique, scene setting, or hooking? 2) What makes your character unique? 3) Pick out your best line of description. 4) Pick out your quirkiest line. 5) Is the genre and sub-genres obvious? 6) Is it clean from silly mistakes – have you read through more than 10 times? 7) Does it end on a cliff-hanger? 8) What makes it different from other novels in that genre? 9) Does it start close to the action? 10) Are you happy with it?...

Show Vs. Tell: Round 1

Hands up if a critic has told you ‘show don’t tell’ (SDT). Keep that hand up if you found it rather unhelpful at the time or if that critic didn’t elaborate much. Yes, it’s a pesky phrase. Showing rather than telling can be a pretty powerful tool, and here's what it really means: Showing brings your words to life, creates imagery, and lets the reader know exactly what’s going on. It doesn’t tell you facts explicitly, but builds an idea in your head so that usually you understand it in far more detail than you would have. Good writing makes you realise a fact without being told it straight. As a writer it forces you to explore your imagination further really think about your story and your characters. It adds depth. *But showing is not always better than telling.* Telling adds pace. It moves the story along and sums up ideas that may be unclear if let to just showing. It doesn’t try to add detail to a relatively boring fact. It lets you know what piece of information is imp...